Affiliate links present. Disclosure
Infatica
Residential and mobile proxy access at mid-market pricing — for teams that need real device IPs without enterprise costs
Choose Infatica if you need both residential and mobile proxies at pricing below the top tier. Skip it if you need deep compliance documentation or the largest possible pool.
Infatica offers the fullest targeting stack documented in this provider set for residential proxies: country, region, city, ISP, ZIP, and ASN targeting are all confirmed via API parameters. This breadth comes alongside five distinct proxy product types on a single platform — residential, mobile, ISP static, dedicated datacenter, and shared datacenter. KYC via Veriff, requiring government ID and a selfie, is mandatory on the first purchase. Teams that need to start making requests without an identity verification step will encounter this barrier at the first transaction regardless of purchase amount.
At a glance
Right fit if
- Teams who need residential and mobile proxy coverage in a single platform without enterprise pricing
- Use cases requiring mobile IPs for platforms that specifically detect and reject datacenter or residential proxies
- Mid-market scraping and automation workloads where cost efficiency matters alongside reasonable reliability
Not the right fit if
- Enterprise teams who require SOC 2, formal compliance audits, or dedicated account management
- Use cases requiring the deepest possible pool coverage or the highest success rates at scale
- Teams who need ISP proxies or advanced targeting below city level
Score breakdown
Scale reflects category fit and operational confidence — not absolute product quality.
Tap WHY to see the verdict · HOW to see the evidence
the pool is mid-tier by category standards — enough for most scraping workloads, not in Bright Data's league. The figure is self-reported with no independent audit. Sufficient for steady residential use cases; shows limits at enterprise scale.
Infatica's residential and mobile pools serve mid-market use cases with solid coverage across major geographic markets without enterprise-level scale. The network is meaningfully sized for the price tier — larger than entry-level providers that target individual developers, smaller than enterprise leaders that maintain pools an order of magnitude larger. The combination of residential and mobile infrastructure under one platform is the primary structural advantage: teams can access both proxy types without managing separate provider relationships, billing accounts, API keys, and integration configurations for residential and mobile workloads independently.
What exists
- a large ethically sourced proxy pool across broad geographic coverage stated on homepage
- broad geographic coverage for residential proxies documented on residential proxies page
- Dynamic residential proxies listed on homepage
- Mobile proxies listed on homepage
What's missing
- Pool size figure is self-reported; no third-party audit referenced on homepage
- Coverage figures for other proxy types not specified on residential proxies page
- Dedicated non-ISP rotating residential with exclusive peer assignment not listed as separate product on homepage
Peer-to-business sourcing via SDK in apps — more transparent than anonymous networks, but KYC via Veriff is mandatory before first purchase. Adds friction at onboarding. ISP static available but location coverage is limited and not fully documented.
Residential and mobile proxies are both available from Infatica, covering use cases that require genuine device-level IP diversity across both connection types. Mobile proxies from real carrier-assigned IPs are valuable for platforms that specifically detect and reject datacenter or residential proxies in favor of mobile network traffic patterns — particularly relevant for mobile app testing and platforms optimized for mobile user flows. The dual coverage in one platform reduces operational complexity for teams whose use cases span both proxy types. ISP proxies and datacenter proxies are not primary Infatica products, meaning teams with those specific requirements need supplementary providers.
What exists
- Peer-to-business model with SDK in apps sourcing consenting user bandwidth documented on residential proxies page
- KYC via Veriff with ID and selfie required for first purchase documented on residential proxies page
- ISP static proxies available monthly with unlimited traffic documented on pricing page
What's missing
- No independent audit of sourcing practices referenced on residential proxies page
- ISP proxy locations limited to select countries — full list not enumerated on pricing page
One of the strongest targeting stacks in the mid-market — country, city, ZIP, ISP, and ASN all available via API parameters. Useful for precision scraping where exact geo or carrier matters. Max sticky session duration not published; dashboard-based rotation not documented — setup requires code.
Country and city-level targeting is available across both residential and mobile pools through standard proxy username parameter configuration following industry conventions. Targeting precision is consistent with mid-market provider standards and covers the geographic granularity needed for most commercial scraping and verification workloads. Below city-level targeting is not available. For use cases where city-level geographic targeting covers the business requirement — the majority of price monitoring, content access verification, and geo-compliance testing — the targeting capability is complete. The mobile proxy pool's targeting is subject to the same city-level ceiling as the residential pool, without carrier-specific routing that specialized mobile providers sometimes offer.
What exists
- City targeting via city parameter in proxy username documented in API tool docs
- ISP targeting via ISP ID parameter documented in API tool docs
- ZIP code targeting in combination with country code documented in API tool docs
- ASN targeting available documented in API tool docs
What's missing
- Maximum sticky session duration not published in residential docs
- Dashboard-based rotation configuration not documented in API tool docs
- Carrier count not published on mobile proxies page
Reliability is adequate for moderate workloads on standard scraping targets. Performance consistency is solid without the enterprise-grade SLA commitments of the largest providers.
Performance is consistent for moderate workloads on standard scraping targets within the pool's operational capacity. The residential pool maintains reasonable session success rates through active quality management that removes degraded IPs before they significantly impact aggregate success rates. Mobile proxy reliability is solid for the pool size — mobile proxy churn is inherently higher than residential because mobile devices change network status, move between carriers, and go offline more frequently than residential connections on fixed broadband. Active pool maintenance manages this natural churn to maintain acceptable success rates. At very high sustained request volumes, reliability gaps relative to enterprise-scale platforms with larger pools become more visible.
What exists
- Consistent performance on standard scraping targets
- Active pool maintenance to remove poor-quality IPs
- Standard uptime for mid-market proxy use cases
What's missing
- No formal uptime SLA with financial remedies
- Performance under very high sustained load is less documented than enterprise providers
Mid-range pricing with real flexibility: PAYG or subscription, residential and mobile billed separately. Annual billing discount rewards stable workloads. Not the cheapest entry point — PAYG residential pricing is above budget-tier alternatives. High-volume pricing requires contacting sales.
Mid-market pricing sits between entry-level providers and enterprise platforms, reflecting the infrastructure investment in maintaining both residential and mobile pools while avoiding the enterprise compliance overhead that drives up costs at the top tier. GB-based billing with subscription tiers provides cost predictability for teams with consistent usage patterns without requiring the minimum commitment structures of enterprise platforms. The pricing is competitive for the combination of residential and mobile access — teams that would otherwise pay for two separate providers to cover both proxy types may find the bundle economics favorable.
What exists
- Residential proxies available PAYG or via subscription documented on pricing page
- PAYG option available for residential and mobile proxies on pricing page
- ISP static and dedicated datacenter available monthly on pricing page
- Annual billing discount documented on pricing page
What's missing
- Trial requires payment — free instant self-serve trial not documented on pricing page
- Custom high-volume plans require contact — no self-serve configuration above standard tiers
API and per-request parameter targeting are well-documented — developer-friendly for custom pipelines. REST only, no GraphQL, no SDK. Requires technical setup; not plug-and-play for non-technical teams.
Standard HTTP/HTTPS authentication with proxy username parameters for geographic targeting and session duration control follows industry-standard proxy configuration conventions. Dashboard provides usage monitoring and configuration management accessible without API knowledge. API access is available for programmatic integration and management for teams that prefer infrastructure-as-code approaches. The integration experience is standard for the category — a developer familiar with proxy integration patterns can configure connections without extensive Infatica-specific documentation study, using the same configuration conventions as other residential proxy providers. Standard proxy protocols ensure compatibility with the full range of automation tools, scraping frameworks, and programming environments without requiring proprietary connectors or specialized drivers.
What exists
- Client API and Proxy API Tool documented on documentation page
- Per-request targeting via proxy username parameters documented in API tool docs
- Login and password authentication in proxy string documented in API tool docs
- IP whitelist authentication available alongside credential-based authentication per API tool docs
What's missing
- GraphQL API not listed on documentation page — REST only
- Sub-user or team account management not documented in API tool docs
- Real-time spend counter not confirmed on homepage
Peer-to-business model with consenting users and a Trust Center is a credible baseline. 'Certified by industry organizations' is vague — no specific certifications named on the homepage. GDPR compliance not explicitly documented. Better than anonymous sourcing, weaker than providers with ISO 27001 or independent audits.
Peer-sourced residential model with standard consent mechanisms and compliance documentation appropriate for standard business requirements and typical commercial due diligence. Mobile proxies are sourced from real carrier-connected devices rather than simulated mobile environments or virtualized mobile IPs. Compliance documentation is adequate for mid-market business due diligence where basic sourcing information is needed. Below the formal audit level that enterprise procurement teams require — SOC 2 certification, formal KYC process documentation, and detailed audit trails are not available. Teams with standard compliance requirements are well-served; formal enterprise compliance frameworks need more documented sourcing transparency.
What exists
- P2B model with consenting users stated on homepage
- Products stated as certified by industry organizations on homepage
- Trust Center referenced on homepage
- Products regularly certified by industry-recognized organizations stated on homepage
What's missing
- No independent audit of sourcing practices referenced on homepage
- GDPR compliance not explicitly documented on homepage
24/7 support is claimed but no channels are listed — live chat, email, Slack are all undocumented. No response time SLA published. Expect basic support availability, not enterprise-level escalation paths.
Standard support through chat and ticket channels with technical coverage for common integration and configuration questions that the mid-market customer base generates. Support depth covers standard proxy use cases — connection configuration, geographic targeting, session management, and billing questions — without the specialist escalation paths of enterprise platforms. Enterprise-level support access with dedicated account management and SLA-backed response time commitments is not part of the standard offering. For mid-market teams with standard integration needs and occasional configuration questions, support quality is functional and adequate for the typical use cases encountered.
What exists
- 24/7 support referenced on residential proxies page
What's missing
- Specific support channels not enumerated on residential proxies page
Trade-offs
- Mobile proxy pool depth is smaller than mobile-specialist providers — carrier-specific gaps appear.
- At very high request volumes, reliability gaps relative to larger platforms become more visible.
- Compliance documentation is below enterprise audit level.
When it breaks
- Mobile proxy pool depth is meaningful but smaller than the largest mobile-focused providers. Coverage gaps in specific mobile carriers or regions can affect success rates for carrier-specific targets.
- At high request volumes, consistency can vary. Infatica is well-suited for moderate workloads but may show reliability gaps under very heavy sustained load.
- Compliance documentation is adequate for standard business use but below the formal audit level that enterprise procurement teams require.
Hidden trade-offs
- Infatica's pricing advantage over top-tier providers reflects infrastructure scale differences. Teams who grow into very high-volume needs may find the quality ceiling lower than at Bright Data or Oxylabs.
- The mobile proxy offering is genuine, but mobile pools are inherently harder to maintain than residential. Churn in mobile IPs is higher, which affects long-term session stability.
Sources
Related comparisons
Thinking about the full anonymity stack?
Proxies route requests. VPNs encrypt the tunnel. Most serious setups use both for different layers.
© 2026 Softplorer