Softplorer Logo

Affiliate links present. Disclosure

Proton VPN
VS
PIA
Proton VPN
PIA

Swiss Independent Ownership vs. US/Kape Open-Source Infrastructure

Proton VPN
PIA

Privacy

9.3
7.4

Security

9.0
2.0

Streaming

8.3
7.4

Speed

8.4
8.1

Apps

8.6
7.5

Devices

8.2
8.4

Value

8.1
8.3
Proton VPN leads in 5PIA leads in 2
Feature
Proton VPN
PIA
Jurisdiction
Switzerland
USA
Eyes alliance
Outside
5-eyes
Independent audit
Max connections
10
10+
Streaming access
Free tier

Quick pick

ProtonVPN fits if Swiss jurisdiction, Proton AG's independent ownership, and Secure Core's double-hop architecture matter as baseline requirements.

PIA fits if a fully open-source client stack, DNS-layer infrastructure blocking, and granular protocol configuration carry more weight than jurisdictional basis and ownership structure.

ProtonVPN operates from Switzerland under Proton AG; PIA operates from the United States under Kape Technologies. Different jurisdictions, different ownership structures, and a genuine split on what transparency means in practice — one through open-source code, one through institutional architecture.

If you choose ProtonVPN

What you get that PIA doesn't offer

Swiss jurisdiction — outside all Eyes alliances; a legal basis PIA's US registration doesn't share. Proton AG's independent ownership carries no conglomerate parent. Secure Core routes traffic through hardened Swiss or Icelandic servers before exit — a double-hop architecture PIA has no structural equivalent to. ProtonVPN optimizes for streaming access; PIA doesn't position around it. Free tier with unlimited bandwidth. Privacy and security architecture is more developed across all measured dimensions.

What you give up

PIA publishes full open-source clients on every platform — including Windows, macOS, and mobile — meaning any researcher can audit the complete codebase without an account. ProtonVPN's open-source coverage is equally comprehensive, but PIA's has been in the public repository longer. PIA's MACE blocking operates at the DNS infrastructure layer — a different implementation approach than ProtonVPN's NetShield. PIA's simultaneous connection allowance is more generous.

If you choose PIA

What you get that ProtonVPN doesn't offer

Fully open-source clients across all platforms, including the full Windows and macOS codebase. MACE ad, tracker, and malware blocking at the DNS infrastructure layer. Highly configurable interface: encryption level, protocol, MTU, and port selection are all user-adjustable. Generous simultaneous connection limits. Long operational track record as an open-source infrastructure provider.

What you give up

United States jurisdiction — 5-eyes member with federal legal reach and no equivalent to Switzerland's constitutional privacy framework. Kape Technologies owns PIA alongside ExpressVPN and CyberGhost — the same parent across three major providers is an ownership concentration ProtonVPN has no parallel to. Streaming reliability gap. ProtonVPN's Secure Core architecture has no PIA equivalent.

Explore each provider in detail

Compare a different pair

Not sure yet?

Explore related categories