Softplorer Logo

Affiliate links present. Disclosure

Cloudways
VS
DigitalOcean
Cloudways
DigitalOcean

Managed Cloud Layer vs. Raw Developer Infrastructure

Cloudways
DigitalOcean

Ease of Use

8.1
7.6

Performance

7.3
7.4

Reliability

6.1
8.0

Scalability

2.4
7.9

Dev. Experience

6.6
8.0

Support

7.9
6.4

Value

7.5
7.6
Cloudways leads in 2DigitalOcean leads in 5
Feature
Cloudways
DigitalOcean
Infrastructure
Managed Cloud
Unmanaged Cloud
Managed stack
Dedicated CPU
Uptime SLA
Hourly billing
Bare metal

Quick pick

Cloudways fits if your team runs PHP applications without dedicated server administration capacity, and the managed panel handling stack operations justifies the added cost over running infrastructure directly.

DigitalOcean fits if your team can own the stack, values first-party managed Kubernetes and databases, needs scalability beyond a single server, or wants infrastructure cost without a management layer markup.

Cloudways can actually run on DigitalOcean -- it's one of the underlying cloud providers available in the Cloudways interface. That context shapes the comparison: the question isn't which infrastructure to use, but whether the Cloudways managed layer over a DigitalOcean Droplet is worth the margin, or whether operating the Droplet directly is the right model for your team.

If you choose Cloudways

What you get that DigitalOcean doesn't offer

A managed stack layer that handles PHP configuration, Redis, Varnish, SSL renewals, Nginx, and backups through a panel -- routine stack operations stay inside the panel. Staging environments built into the management interface. Multi-cloud provider choice within the same panel: DigitalOcean, AWS, GCP, or Vultr without changing tools. 24/7 live chat support included -- DigitalOcean's support is primarily documentation and community. For PHP-based teams without dedicated DevOps, Cloudways' operational model keeps more configuration inside the panel.

What you give up

DigitalOcean provides full root access, direct Droplet configuration, first-party Kubernetes (DOKS), managed databases, and object storage (Spaces) -- services Cloudways doesn't replicate at the infrastructure level. Vertical scaling in Cloudways requires server resize via panel; DigitalOcean's infrastructure supports horizontal scaling, load balancers, and Kubernetes without a middleware layer. The Cloudways margin over raw DigitalOcean infrastructure is a real, ongoing cost -- relevant for teams who already manage their own stack and don't need the abstraction.

If you choose DigitalOcean

What you get that Cloudways doesn't offer

Direct infrastructure access -- full root SSH, OS-level control, custom firewall rules, and no managed layer between you and the compute. First-party managed Kubernetes (DOKS), managed PostgreSQL and MySQL, and Spaces object storage as native services. A scalability path that includes horizontal scaling, load balancers, and Kubernetes without middleware. Infrastructure cost without a management margin -- you pay only for the Droplet and services you use.

What you give up

Stack configuration -- PHP, Redis, SSL, backups, staging -- is yours to configure and maintain on DigitalOcean. Cloudways' managed panel reduces the operational overhead for teams running PHP applications at moderate scale without needing the depth of DigitalOcean's ecosystem. Support on DigitalOcean is primarily documentation and community; Cloudways provides 24/7 live chat for managed stack questions. For teams without DevOps capacity, DigitalOcean's control surface is the operational overhead rather than the advantage.

Explore each provider in detail

Compare a different pair

Not sure yet?

Explore related categories