Softplorer Logo

Affiliate links present. Disclosure

DigitalOcean vs Hetzner

DigitalOcean
VS
Hetzner
DigitalOcean
Hetzner

Global Developer Cloud vs. Six-Location Cloud Compute

Fact-checked and maintained by Softplorer Research

DigitalOcean
Hetzner

Ease of Use

7.6
4.8

Performance

7.4
7.4

Reliability

8.0
8.4

Scalability

7.9
8.1

Dev. Experience

8.0
7.7

Support

6.4
5.9

Value

7.6
8.2
DigitalOcean leads in 3Hetzner leads in 3
Feature
DigitalOcean
Hetzner
Infrastructure
Unmanaged Cloud
Global Value Cloud
Managed stack
✕
✕
Dedicated CPU
✓
✓
Uptime SLA
✓
✓
Hourly billing
✓
✓
Bare metal
✕
✓

Quick pick

→ Choose DigitalOcean when global reach and a wider managed-service catalog are part of the plan.

→ Choose Hetzner when a focused cloud-compute stack in its six documented locations matches the workload.

DigitalOcean offers a broad developer cloud with a larger global footprint; Hetzner Cloud concentrates compute and related services in six current locations across Europe, the United States and Singapore. Both are infrastructure products, but their geographic and ecosystem priorities differ.

If you choose DigitalOcean

More regions and more managed services

DigitalOcean’s global infrastructure page lists 20 data centers across 12 regions. Alongside Droplets, the platform includes managed Kubernetes, managed databases, object storage and networking services, with a 99.99% uptime SLA published for Droplets and Volumes.

A larger platform is not automatically simpler

If your workload only needs cloud instances, volumes, networks and load balancing, Hetzner’s narrower service surface can be easier to reason about. DigitalOcean’s advantage is breadth, which matters most when you actually intend to use those additional managed products.

If you choose Hetzner

Focused cloud primitives in six documented locations

Hetzner’s current Cloud documentation lists Falkenstein, Nuremberg, Helsinki, Ashburn, Hillsboro and Singapore. Across those locations it offers cloud instances plus features such as networks, firewalls, volumes, backups, load balancers and placement groups.

The footprint is materially smaller

DigitalOcean reaches more regions and provides a deeper set of managed application services. If latency to markets outside Hetzner’s six locations or access to managed Kubernetes and database products is central to the architecture, DigitalOcean has the broader fit.

Explore each provider in detail

Compare a different pair

Not sure yet?

Related comparisons

Explore related categories