Softplorer Logo

Affiliate links present. Disclosure

Kamatera vs Linode (Akamai)

Kamatera
VS
Linode (Akamai)
Kamatera
Linode (Akamai)

Granular IaaS Sizing vs. Akamai Cloud Services

Fact-checked and maintained by Softplorer Research

Kamatera
Linode (Akamai)

Ease of Use

4.7
7.8

Performance

6.9
7.0

Reliability

6.6
6.9

Scalability

6.1
8.0

Dev. Experience

6.1
7.7

Support

6.6
6.2

Value

7.1
7.3
Kamatera leads in 1Linode (Akamai) leads in 6
Feature
Kamatera
Linode (Akamai)
Infrastructure
Configurable Cloud
Unmanaged Cloud
Managed stack
✕
✕
Dedicated CPU
✓
✓
Uptime SLA
✓
✓
Hourly billing
✓
✓
Bare metal
✕
✕

Quick pick

→ Choose Kamatera when resource customization and flexible hourly infrastructure are the primary requirements.

→ Choose Linode when the priority is a broader cloud service catalog with managed databases, Kubernetes and Akamai's compute platform around the VM.

Kamatera and Linode both give you direct control of cloud servers, but they emphasize different kinds of flexibility. Kamatera focuses on configurable resources and hourly/monthly billing. Linode focuses on a broader developer-cloud ecosystem under Akamai.

If you choose Kamatera

Sizing and billing flexibility

Kamatera lets you shape the infrastructure more directly. It supports flexible server configurations, hourly or monthly billing, 20+ data-center locations and adjacent services such as cloud firewalls, load balancers and private networking. Managed Cloud is also available separately for customers who want operational assistance.

Managed cloud services sacrificed

Linode offers more managed cloud services around compute. LKE Kubernetes, managed databases, block and object storage and NodeBalancers sit in the same Akamai Cloud account, and covered general-availability compute is backed by a 99.99% monthly uptime SLA.

If you choose Linode

Managed cloud services

Linode is the stronger choice when the server is expected to become part of a larger cloud application platform. Native managed databases and Kubernetes reduce the need to build those layers yourself on ordinary VMs.

Sizing flexibility sacrificed

Kamatera gives you more freedom to tune the server purchase itself and to use short-lived hourly infrastructure. Its 20+ location footprint and flexible sizing can be useful when standard instance families do not map cleanly to the workload.

Explore each provider in detail

Compare a different pair

Not sure yet?

Related comparisons

Explore related categories