Softplorer Logo

Affiliate links present. Disclosure

Bright Data
VS
Decodo
Bright Data
Decodo

Enterprise Compliance Depth vs. Mid-Market Compliance Credentials

Bright Data
Decodo

Network Scale

8.0
7.3

Proxy Types

8.1
6.6

Targeting

8.4
7.2

Reliability

6.7
4.9

Pricing Model

7.2
7.7

Dev Experience

7.6
7.8

Compliance

7.4
7.0

Support

7.2
4.8
Bright Data leads in 6Decodo leads in 2
Feature
Bright Data
Decodo
ASN targeting
Mobile proxies
Published SLA
Free tier
Scraper API
Compliance cert
PAYG available

Quick pick

Bright Data fits if pool size above 100M, ASN residential targeting, a contractual SLA, dedicated residential IPs, or GDPR DPA availability are requirements.

Decodo fits if ISO 27001:2022 certification, EWDCI credentials, a money-back evaluation period, or IP whitelist authentication matter -- and ASN targeting and dedicated residential IPs are not requirements.

Bright Data and Decodo overlap on several enterprise-facing requirements: both require KYC, both source residential IPs through opt-in partner networks, both hold compliance credentials. The difference is tier and depth. Bright Data operates at enterprise scale -- 150M+ residential IPs, a 15-minute SLA, ASN targeting on residential, HAR instrumentation, dedicated IPs. Decodo operates one tier below -- ISO 27001:2022 and EWDCI co-founder status provide independently verifiable credentials, a 3-day trial and 14-day money-back lower the cost of evaluation, and ZIP plus coordinate targeting on residential covers most commercial use cases.

If you choose Bright Data

What you get that Decodo doesn't offer

A 150M+ residential pool against Decodo's 33M+. ASN and carrier-level targeting on residential -- Decodo documents city, ZIP, and coordinate targeting but not ASN. A published SLA with 15-minute engineer response and financial penalty terms -- Decodo has no documented SLA. Dedicated residential IPs with exclusive peer assignment. HAR-level traffic instrumentation through the Proxy Manager desktop app. Automatic failover on residential with transparent peer replacement. 7M mobile IPs across real 3G/4G/5G carriers. GDPR and CCPA compliance with a published DPA.

What you give up

Decodo's ISO 27001:2022 certification is independently audited -- Bright Data does not document the same kind of third-party sourcing audit. Decodo's 3-day trial and 14-day money-back guarantee lower evaluation risk -- Bright Data offers trial credits but no money-back guarantee is documented. Decodo gates no functionality behind KYC at the entry tier -- Bright Data requires KYC before full residential network access.

If you choose Decodo

What you get that Bright Data doesn't offer

ISO 27001:2022 certification -- independently audited, not self-reported. EWDCI co-founder and EWDCI Certified status for residential proxy sourcing. A 3-day trial and 14-day money-back guarantee. IP whitelist authentication as an alternative to credential-based access. Entry to the network without requiring full KYC at the trial stage. ZIP and coordinate targeting on residential -- sufficient for most geo-precision use cases.

What you give up

Bright Data's 150M+ residential pool is 4x Decodo's 33M+. ASN targeting on residential. A contractual SLA with financial penalties and a 15-minute response commitment. Dedicated residential IPs with exclusive assignment. HAR-level traffic instrumentation. Automatic failover. GDPR DPA. Mobile pool at 7M IPs. Bright Data includes a Proxy Manager desktop application; Decodo keeps the workflow closer to direct proxy access.

Explore each provider in detail

Compare a different pair

Not sure yet?

Explore related categories