Softplorer Logo

Affiliate links present. Disclosure

Oxylabs
VS
NetNut
Oxylabs
NetNut

Managed Scraper API Layer vs. ISP-Direct Network Architecture

Oxylabs
NetNut

Network Scale

7.3
7.7

Proxy Types

7.2
6.4

Targeting

8.0
5.4

Reliability

4.8
5.0

Pricing Model

8.0
4.0

Dev Experience

7.9
5.5

Compliance

7.1
4.2

Support

5.8
4.0
Oxylabs leads in 6NetNut leads in 2
Feature
Oxylabs
NetNut
ASN targeting
Mobile proxies
Published SLA
Free tier
Scraper API
Compliance cert
PAYG available

Quick pick

Oxylabs fits if a managed Scraper API layer, JavaScript rendering, CAPTCHA solving, or low-friction evaluation before procurement are requirements.

NetNut fits if ISP-direct residential routing without peer-device dependency, session stability from infrastructure rather than peer assignment, or CDN proxy access are the architectural constraints.

Oxylabs and NetNut both operate large residential networks with enterprise-facing positioning -- but the infrastructure underneath differs. Oxylabs routes residential through a peer-based network and wraps it in a Scraper API layer for JavaScript rendering and structured data extraction. NetNut routes residential through direct ISP partnerships rather than end-user devices, avoiding peer-dependency variability, and also separates CDN proxy access as its own product type.

If you choose Oxylabs

What you get that NetNut doesn't offer

A Scraper API layer handling JavaScript rendering, CAPTCHA solving, and structured data extraction -- NetNut delivers raw proxy access without a managed extraction layer. ASN targeting on mobile proxies. A free residential trial without credit card entry. Shared endpoints accessible before full account approval completes. Dedicated account managers on enterprise plans. A Web Scraper IDE for no-code data collection.

What you give up

NetNut's ISP-direct routing -- residential IPs connect through ISP infrastructure rather than end-user devices, which removes the peer availability dependency that peer-based networks carry. NetNut's CDN proxy type, which Oxylabs does not offer. Session stability on ISP static proxies comes from infrastructure rather than peer assignment -- which behaves differently from Oxylabs' peer-based residential sessions under sustained load.

If you choose NetNut

What you get that Oxylabs doesn't offer

ISP-direct residential routing -- IPs that route through ISP infrastructure, removing end-user device dependency. CDN proxy access as a separate proxy type. Session stability on static ISP proxies that comes from infrastructure availability rather than peer churn. A 53M+ ISP-direct residential pool.

What you give up

Oxylabs' Scraper API -- JavaScript rendering, CAPTCHA solving, and structured data extraction as a managed layer. ASN targeting on mobile. A free trial accessible before pricing engagement. Shared endpoints for low-friction evaluation. Dedicated account management. NetNut's pricing requires sales engagement for enterprise rates -- Oxylabs publishes more of its pricing structure directly. Oxylabs' Web Scraper IDE for no-code workflows.

Explore each provider in detail

Compare a different pair

Not sure yet?

Explore related categories