Softplorer Logo

Affiliate links present. Disclosure

Oxylabs
VS
Soax
Oxylabs
Soax

Managed Extraction Layer vs. Operational Observability and Protocol Breadth

Oxylabs
Soax

Network Scale

7.3
7.8

Proxy Types

7.2
5.5

Targeting

8.0
4.8

Reliability

4.8
3.0

Pricing Model

8.0
6.9

Dev Experience

7.9
3.3

Compliance

7.1
3.7

Support

5.8
5.7
Oxylabs leads in 7Soax leads in 1
Feature
Oxylabs
Soax
ASN targeting
Mobile proxies
Published SLA
Free tier
Scraper API
Compliance cert
PAYG available

Quick pick

Oxylabs fits if a managed Scraper API layer handling JavaScript rendering and CAPTCHA, ASN targeting on mobile, no-code scraping workflows, or dedicated account management are requirements.

Soax fits if real-time failure rate and banned IP monitoring during campaigns, UDP or QUIC protocol support, or a large mobile pool from real cellular carriers are operational priorities.

Oxylabs and Soax both target mid-to-enterprise scraping workloads -- but the product value proposition is oriented differently. Oxylabs wraps the proxy network in a Scraper API layer: JavaScript rendering, CAPTCHA solving, and structured data extraction handled as a managed service. Soax keeps the proxy layer direct but adds operational tooling: a real-time dashboard for failure rates, banned IP tracking, and speed metrics, alongside UDP and QUIC protocol support and a 33M mobile pool from real cellular carriers.

If you choose Oxylabs

What you get that Soax doesn't offer

A Scraper API layer handling JavaScript rendering, CAPTCHA solving, and structured data extraction -- Soax delivers proxy access without a managed extraction layer. ASN targeting on mobile proxies. A free residential trial without credit card entry. A Web Scraper IDE for no-code data collection. Dedicated account managers on enterprise plans. Shared endpoints accessible for evaluation before enterprise onboarding completes.

What you give up

Soax's real-time observability dashboard -- failure rates, banned IP monitoring, and speed metrics during active campaigns. UDP and QUIC protocol support. A 33M mobile pool from real 3G/4G/5G cellular carriers -- Oxylabs' mobile pool size is not published. ISP-level targeting on residential. Soax's 3-day trial for proxy performance evaluation. Soax's subscription model is fixed but transparent in tier structure; Oxylabs' pricing on enterprise Scraper API products involves more negotiation.

If you choose Soax

What you get that Oxylabs doesn't offer

A real-time observability dashboard -- failure rates, banned IP tracking, speed metrics, custom reports, and alerts during proxy usage. UDP and QUIC protocol support for non-standard workloads. A 33M mobile pool from real 3G/4G/5G cellular carriers. ISP-level targeting on residential proxies. A 3-day trial to evaluate proxy network performance before committing.

What you give up

Oxylabs' Scraper API -- JavaScript rendering, CAPTCHA solving, and structured extraction as a managed layer. ASN targeting on mobile. A Web Scraper IDE for no-code workflows. Dedicated account managers. Oxylabs documents completed compliance materials where Soax lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 as in progress. Texas is excluded from Soax's residential network.

Explore each provider in detail

Compare a different pair

Not sure yet?

Explore related categories