NordVPN vs Surfshark

Both sit inside Nord Security — the same corporate group. This is an internal comparison: each product maintains its own infrastructure and pricing model, but the ownership trust question is identical for both.

What you get that Surfshark doesn't offer

Panama legal entity — outside all Eyes alliances. Surfshark registers in the Netherlands, a Nine Eyes member (though no mandatory data-retention law is currently in force there — the Dutch national law was struck down in 2015). Security feature scope is more developed: deeper protocol coverage, specialty server categories, and Threat Protection as an integrated layer. Speed consistency leads. More extensive audit history. Better app experience for users navigating advanced options.

What you give up

Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections — NordVPN caps at ten. That gap is practical for large households or teams. Surfshark's long-term value position is more accommodating, and device support reflects the unlimited connection model. Both share the same corporate ownership, so the group-level trust signal is the same either way.

What you get that NordVPN doesn't offer

Unlimited simultaneous connections — no per-device ceiling on the account. More accommodating long-term value position. Broader device support by connection count. CleanWeb ad and tracker blocking included. Same Nord Security audit infrastructure as NordVPN.

What you give up

Netherlands is a Nine Eyes member state, though no mandatory data-retention law currently compels logging there — the Dutch national law was struck down in 2015. NordVPN's Panama entity sits outside all Eyes alliances entirely, a cleaner separation. Security feature depth gap — more apparent in specialty server coverage and protocol breadth. NordVPN optimizes for speed-sensitive routing on demanding routes. NordVPN has the longer operational audit trail.