Affiliate links present. Disclosure
PrivadoVPN vs TunnelBear
Router & TV Coverage vs. Unlimited Paid Devices
Fact-checked and maintained by Softplorer Research
Privacy
Security
Streaming
Speed
Apps
Devices
Value
Quick pick
→ PrivadoVPN fits better when router setup and native TV coverage are jobs you need solved.
→ TunnelBear fits better when paid plans that do not make you count simultaneous devices matter more than those extra device paths.
Both services let you start on a continuing free plan, so free access does not decide this one. PrivadoVPN has the broader router-and-TV setup; TunnelBear removes the paid-plan device cap.
PrivadoVPN: when the VPN has to reach more devices
Router setup is officially documented
PrivadoVPN officially documents router setup. TunnelBear does not currently provide an official router-configuration path. If you want the VPN on a router instead of only on individual apps, that is a hard capability difference.
TV-app coverage is confirmed too
PrivadoVPN includes native TV-app coverage in its current device mix. Native TV or console apps are not part of TunnelBear's confirmed device set. That makes PrivadoVPN the more natural fit when a living-room device is part of the plan.
TunnelBear: when you hate counting devices
Paid plans remove the simultaneous-device cap
TunnelBear's paid plans do not make you count simultaneous devices. PrivadoVPN uses a connection cap rather than an unlimited-device model. If phones, tablets, and laptops keep piling up, this is the convenience difference you are likely to feel most often.
The free plan is shared, not exclusive
TunnelBear has a continuing free plan. PrivadoVPN has a continuing free plan. You can try either service without a paid subscription, so compare the device coverage rather than treating free access as a tie-breaker.
Explore each provider in detail
Compare a different pair
Not sure yet?
Related comparisons
Explore related categories
© 2026 Softplorer