Affiliate links present. Disclosure
Oxylabs vs Rayobyte
Massive Multi-Network Scale vs. Detailed Protocol Controls and Formal SLA
Fact-checked and maintained by Softplorer Research
Network Scale
Proxy Types
Targeting
Reliability
Pricing Model
Dev Experience
Compliance
Support
Quick pick
Oxylabs fits teams that need very large residential/mobile networks, coordinate and ASN targeting, and advanced IP-version or OS filters.
Rayobyte fits teams that prioritize detailed protocol support, a formal 99.9% SLA with service credits, and highly explicit residential routing controls.
Oxylabs and Rayobyte both target professional data collection, but their strongest claims live in different layers. Oxylabs advertises 175M+ residential IPs across 195 countries and 20M+ mobile IPs, with advanced location and device filters. Rayobyte advertises 40M+ residential IPs across 163+ locations, publishes a formal 99.9% monthly uptime SLA, and documents HTTP/3 over QUIC for residential traffic.
Choosing Oxylabs
Oxylabs advantages
Oxylabs provides substantially more published network breadth. Residential targeting includes continent, country, state, city, ZIP, coordinates, and ASN, with optional IPv4/IPv6 and OS filters. Mobile adds 20M+ IPs across 140+ countries. Unlimited concurrent residential sessions and public API-based proxy-user management make the platform suitable for large multi-team deployments.
What Rayobyte exposes more explicitly
Rayobyte's current documentation goes deep on transport and contractual availability. Residential traffic supports HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, and HTTP/3/QUIC-related workflows, while targeting can include country, state, city, ZIP, ASN, device OS, and IP version. Its separate SLA commits to at least 99.9% monthly uptime with service credits if the commitment is missed.
Choosing Rayobyte
Rayobyte advantages
Rayobyte is compelling when protocol fidelity and a written service commitment matter. The residential docs cover modern HTTP/3 as well as granular routing fields, and the SLA is a distinct contractual document rather than a marketing uptime number. The 40M+ residential pool and 163+ locations are smaller than Oxylabs' published scale but still designed for enterprise use.
Where Oxylabs is broader
Oxylabs publishes a much larger residential pool and adds a 20M+ mobile network. Coordinate targeting is explicit, and OS plus IP-version filters are built into the residential product. For projects where breadth of exits and mobile access matter more than HTTP/3 or an uptime-credit mechanism, Oxylabs has the stronger public feature set.
Explore each provider in detail
Compare a different pair
Not sure yet?
Related comparisons
Explore related categories
© 2026 Softplorer