Affiliate links present. Disclosure
Oxylabs vs Infatica
Massive Pool and Advanced Filters vs. Compliance Credentials and Flexible Rotation
Fact-checked and maintained by Softplorer Research
Network Scale
Proxy Types
Targeting
Reliability
Pricing Model
Dev Experience
Compliance
Support
Quick pick
Oxylabs fits high-scale data collection that needs very large residential/mobile pools and the deepest published targeting and environment filters.
Infatica fits teams that value a broad proxy catalog, flexible rotation modes, and a provider that foregrounds ISO-backed compliance credentials.
Oxylabs and Infatica both cover enterprise proxy use cases, but the published scale is very different. Oxylabs advertises 175M+ residential IPs and 20M+ mobile IPs, with deep filters including coordinates, ASN, IP version, and operating system. Infatica's current pricing pages use a 45M+ IP headline and emphasize flexible rotation, multiple proxy classes, and a compliance stack that includes four ISO certifications.
Choosing Oxylabs
Oxylabs advantages
Oxylabs is stronger on published pool size and advanced targeting. Residential proxies span 195 countries with continent, country, state, city, ZIP, coordinate, and ASN filters; IPv4/IPv6 and OS filters can also be applied. Its 20M+ mobile pool extends precise targeting into carrier networks, and residential supports unlimited concurrent sessions.
What Infatica contributes
Infatica provides a broad product catalog and more explicit compliance messaging. Residential setup supports country, region, city, ISP, ZIP, and OS filters, while rotation can occur per request, on intervals from 5 to 60 minutes, or in sticky mode. Current company materials list ISO 27001, 27701, 22301, and 20000-1 certifications.
Choosing Infatica
Infatica advantages
Infatica makes sense when governance, proxy-type breadth, and flexible session control matter more than the largest possible pool. Residential, mobile, datacenter, ISP, and IPv6 products are all part of the current catalog, and the residential configuration is detailed enough for country-to-ZIP routing plus controlled rotation schedules.
Where Oxylabs is larger and more granular
Oxylabs publishes a 175M+ residential network, versus Infatica's 45M+ plan-wide headline and 40M+ residential figure on another current page. Because Infatica uses different scope labels, those two numbers should not be merged. Oxylabs also explicitly documents coordinate, ASN, IP-version, and OS filters on the residential product.
Explore each provider in detail
Compare a different pair
Not sure yet?
Related comparisons
Explore related categories
© 2026 Softplorer